Response #9 Should Some Species Be Allowed to Die Out?

Link to Article

This article's title immediately stuck out to me. That's why I clicked on it, as it seems like an extreme 'controversial' stance on the guilted mind of a human who want's to save every possible species that they have contributed to the failing of. Many of the methods in conserving endangered species hinder other parts of the economy, as valuable resources are spent in attempts to revive a dying population in captivity, while others cease land development to preserve wild habitats. Many have disliked this method of approaching things, and many circumstances have changed (Including the new president) to allow a potential overhaul of the Endangered Species Act.

In reality, some species may have to die. It would be the survival of the fittest, in regards to natural selection. However, people feel guilt as most endangered species and those on the verge of extinction are due to human activity. It however, leads to a discussion in which the value (whether it be ecological or economical) of a species is pitted against that of another species. I agree with the notion that trying to save every specie is impractical, impossible, and unrealistic. Many have to keep in mind that natural extinction occurs, and is not always tied to human activity. Due to humanity's hero complex however, they want to save every dying species, and help prevent any potential extinction.

Some say people should put the effort into saving the most genetically diverse species, to assist in surviving the genetic diversity. Others say that doing so may cause unintentional consequences. Many people in the public are only aware of endangered species that are either large and noticeable, or cute and adorable and thus "must be protected!". To pit lives against each other is no morally sound task, nor is it one people notice they are doing in the first place. I found it interesting how the researchers spent more time killing the invasive rats who preyed upon the birds, rather than sighting and recording birds. It's not the approach people would be aware of, but it's work. If anything, it raises more moral questions when dealing with an invasive species. Regardless though, I don't have an answer to this dilemma, as even researchers don't know what to do.